Dismissal of complaint for non-admission of revision without reasoning under § 544(6) ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the plaintiffs' complaint for non-admission of revision, thereby upholding the appellate court's decision from November 8, 2022, and leaving the lower court's judgment in force; the court declined to provide a written justification for this dismissal pursuant to § 544(6) Sentence 2, second half-sentence, German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), finding such a justification would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision, while ordering the plaintiffs to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings. The dispute concerned a civil matter with a statutory value in dispute of €65,000, where the plaintiffs sought to challenge the appellate court's refusal to allow the appeal on points of law. The decision rests on the procedural doctrine that a court may omit the reasons for dismissing a non-admission complaint if those reasons would be ineffective for legal clarification, based strictly on the procedural provisions of the ZPO.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Dismissal of complaint for non-admission of revision without reasoning under § 544(6) ZPO: The dispute concerned a civil matter with a statutory value in dispute of €65,000, where the plaintiffs sought to challenge the appellate court's refusal to allow the appeal on points of law. The decision rests on the procedural doctrine that a court may omit the reasons for dismissing a non-admission complaint if those reasons would be ineffective for legal clarification, based strictly on the procedural provisions of the ZPO.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited to justify the omission of the written reasoning for dismissing the complaint for non-admission of revision.
Cited to order the plaintiffs to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Kläger gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 2. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Oldenburg vom 8. November 2022 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Kläger tragen die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 65.000 €
Pamp Halfmeier Kartzke
Jurgeleit Sacher