Non-admission of appeal in revision without reasoned justification under § 544 ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint against the non-admission of an appeal in revision, leaving the Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe judgment of May 12, 2023, in final effect, with the plaintiff ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings and a subject value of €195,000. The dispute involved a civil claim where the plaintiff challenged the procedural decision by the higher regional court to deny permission to appeal to the supreme court, a decision the BGH upheld without providing a detailed written justification. The court relied on § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which permits omitting reasons for the dismissal of a non-admission complaint if such reasons would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting an appeal in revision, and applied § 97(1) ZPO to allocate the litigation costs to the unsuccessful party.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Non-admission of appeal in revision without reasoned justification under § 544 ZPO: The dispute involved a civil claim where the plaintiff challenged the procedural decision by the higher regional court to deny permission to appeal to the supreme court, a decision the BGH upheld without providing a detailed written justification. The court relied on § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which permits omitting reasons for the dismissal of a non-admission complaint if such reasons would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting an appeal in revision, and applied § 97(1) ZPO to allocate the litigation costs to the unsuccessful party.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertJustifies the omission of a reasoned judgment for the dismissal of the complaint against non-admission of the appeal in revision.
Basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde des Klägers gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 4. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Karlsruhe in Freiburg vom 12. Mai 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Der Kläger trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 195.000 €
Pamp Halfmeier Jurgeleit
Graßnack Borris