Waiver of reasoning in non-admission of revision complaint under § 544(6) No. 2 ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint against the non-admission of revision, rejecting the appeal and ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the appellate proceedings, thereby leaving the judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Cologne intact. The dispute concerned a civil matter with an amount in controversy of 311,096.59 euros, wherein the plaintiff challenged the lower court’s refusal to allow a constitutional appeal based on perceived legal errors. The court decided that no substantive reasoning was necessary for the dismissal because such reasoning would not contribute to the clarification of the requirements for admitting a revision, pursuant to Section 544(6) Sentence 2, Second Half-Sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which permits the court to dispense with an explanation when it does not advance legal certainty.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Waiver of reasoning in non-admission of revision complaint under § 544(6) No. 2 ZPO: The dispute concerned a civil matter with an amount in controversy of 311,096.59 euros, wherein the plaintiff challenged the lower court’s refusal to allow a constitutional appeal based on perceived legal errors. The court decided that no substantive reasoning was necessary for the dismissal because such reasoning would not contribute to the clarification of the requirements for admitting a revision, pursuant to Section 544(6) Sentence 2, Second Half-Sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which permits the court to dispense with an explanation when it does not advance legal certainty.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertJustifies the decision to dispense with a substantive reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint because it would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting revision.
Basis for the order that the plaintiff bears the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 7. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Köln vom 11. Mai 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 311.096,59 €
Pamp
Halfmeier
Graßnack
Brenneisen
Hannamann