Admissibility of non-admission of revision complaint in civil proceedings under § 544 ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe BGH 7th Civil Senate dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of revision, leaving the Lower Regional Court's procedural order in force; the plaintiff bears the costs of the appeal proceedings, and the disputed value was capped at €95,000. This procedural ruling addresses a civil dispute where the plaintiff challenged the 14th Civil Senate of the Lower Regional Court's decision not to allow an appeal to the Federal Court of Justice, effectively finalizing the lower court's disposition of the case without a substantive review on the merits. The decision relied on § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), under which the court waived a written reasoning because it would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting revision, and applied § 97(1) ZPO to assign the costs of the complaint proceedings to the unsuccessful applicant.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Admissibility of non-admission of revision complaint in civil proceedings under § 544 ZPO: This procedural ruling addresses a civil dispute where the plaintiff challenged the 14th Civil Senate of the Lower Regional Court's decision not to allow an appeal to the Federal Court of Justice, effectively finalizing the lower court's disposition of the case without a substantive review on the merits. The decision relied on § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), under which the court waived a written reasoning because it would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting revision, and applied § 97(1) ZPO to assign the costs of the complaint proceedings to the unsuccessful applicant.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertJustifies the omission of a reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint because it would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting revision.
Basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Beschluss des 14. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Celle vom 24. Juni 2022 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: bis 95.000 €
Pamp Halfmeier Graßnack
Sacher Borris