Admissibility of revision in civil proceedings and waiver of reasoned decision
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of a revision appeal, thereby leaving the judgment of the 21st Civil Senate of the Kammergericht from April 18, 2023, in force and upholding the prevailing position of the opposing party; the court ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings and set the value in dispute at €24,974.81. The dispute concerned a civil matter where the plaintiff sought to challenge the lower court's decision through an appeal to the BGH by arguing that the Kammergericht had failed to allow a revision appeal, but the BGH declined to provide a reasoned decision as such reasoning would not contribute to clarifying the conditions under which a revision is admissible. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2nd half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which permits omitting a justification for dismissal if it does not aid in defining the prerequisites for admitting a revision, alongside § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO regarding the allocation of procedural costs.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Admissibility of revision in civil proceedings and waiver of reasoned decision: The dispute concerned a civil matter where the plaintiff sought to challenge the lower court's decision through an appeal to the BGH by arguing that the Kammergericht had failed to allow a revision appeal, but the BGH declined to provide a reasoned decision as such reasoning would not contribute to clarifying the conditions under which a revision is admissible. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2nd half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which permits omitting a justification for dismissal if it does not aid in defining the prerequisites for admitting a revision, alongside § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO regarding the allocation of procedural costs.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertProcedural rule permitting the court to omit a detailed justification for the dismissal of the complaint against the non-admission of revision.
Basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 21. Zivilsenats des Kammergerichts vom 18. April 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 24.974,81 €
Pamp
Halfmeier
Jurgeleit
Graßnack
Boris