Dismissal of leave to appeal without reasoned judgment under § 544(6) Sentence 2, second half-sentence, ZPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Civil Procedure dismissed the plaintiff's application for leave to appeal in revision against the Kammergericht's judgment dated January 12, 2024, thereby rendering the lower court's decision final and binding; the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the appellate proceedings, and the court refrained from providing a detailed written reasoning as it deemed such an explanation unnecessary for clarifying the legal criteria for admitting revisions under § 544(6) Sentence 2, second half-sentence, of the German Code of Civil Procedure. The dispute, with a subject matter value of €277,240.66, concerned a civil matter where the plaintiff challenged the appeal court's ruling, but no substantive grounds for a constitutional or public interest exception to non-disclosure of reasoning were found. The decisive legal basis was the dismissal under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO, coupled with the cost allocation rule in § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Dismissal of leave to appeal without reasoned judgment under § 544(6) Sentence 2, second half-sentence, ZPO: The dispute, with a subject matter value of €277,240.66, concerned a civil matter where the plaintiff challenged the appeal court's ruling, but no substantive grounds for a constitutional or public interest exception to non-disclosure of reasoning were found. The decisive legal basis was the dismissal under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO, coupled with the cost allocation rule in § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a written reasoning for the dismissal of the application for leave to appeal.
Cited in the dispositive to allocate the costs of the appellate proceedings to the losing party.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 7. Zivilsenats des Kammergerichts vom 12. Januar 2024 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 277.240,66 €
Pamp Jurgeleit Graßnack
Borris Hannamann