Waiver of reasoning for complaint against non-admission of revision under § 544(6) ZPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) rejected the plaintiff's complaint against the refusal to grant leave for revision, thereby upholding the decision of the Munich Higher Regional Court and leaving the underlying judgment in force. The dispute involved a civil matter with a subject matter value of approximately €241,362, where the plaintiff sought to challenge the lower court's non-admission of an appeal on points of law. The court denied the complaint without providing a substantive reasoning, invoking its discretionary power to omit an explanation when it would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for granting leave for revision. The decision is based on § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which permits the court to waive a reasoning statement in such non-admission proceedings.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Waiver of reasoning for complaint against non-admission of revision under § 544(6) ZPO: The dispute involved a civil matter with a subject matter value of approximately €241,362, where the plaintiff sought to challenge the lower court's non-admission of an appeal on points of law. The court denied the complaint without providing a substantive reasoning, invoking its discretionary power to omit an explanation when it would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for granting leave for revision. The decision is based on § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which permits the court to waive a reasoning statement in such non-admission proceedings.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertProcedural rule permitting the court to omit the reasoning for the rejection of the complaint against the non-admission of revision.
Basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 20. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts München vom 14. Juni 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 241.361,81 €
Pamp Graßnack Sacher
Borris Hannamann