Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VII ZR 65/22 KI-generiert

Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of civil revision without written justification

Geschäftsnummer VII ZR 65/22
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Civil Procedure (BGH) dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of appeal, leaving the lower court's judgment in force and ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the proceedings. The dispute concerned a civil matter where the plaintiff attempted to challenge the Oberlandesgericht's refusal to admit a revision (appeal on points of law) based on alleged deficiencies in the lower court's reasoning. The BGH rejected the complaint under § 544(6) Sentence 2, second half-sentence, and § 97(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), determining that a written justification for the dismissal would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision, thereby upholding the procedural decision without substantive examination.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of civil revision without written justification: The dispute concerned a civil matter where the plaintiff attempted to challenge the Oberlandesgericht's refusal to admit a revision (appeal on points of law) based on alleged deficiencies in the lower court's reasoning. The BGH rejected the complaint under § 544(6) Sentence 2, second half-sentence, and § 97(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), determining that a written justification for the dismissal would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision, thereby upholding the procedural decision without substantive examination.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
zivilrechtliche Revision Streitgegenstand materielle Begründetheit Rückzug der Zivilklage Rückzug des Revisionsgesuchs prozessleitende Verfügungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for waiving the written justification of the dismissal because it would not contribute to clarifying the requirements for admitting revision.
§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO
Legal basis cited in the dispositive for imposing the costs of the appeal proceedings on the unsuccessful plaintiff.
KI-generiert
VII ZR 233/23
Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of civil revision without written justification
VII ZR 226/22
Dismissal of complaint for non-admission of revision without reasoning under § 544(6) ZPO
VII ZR 443/21
Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision without reasoning under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO
VII ZR 199/21
Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision without substantive reasoning
VII ZR 846/21
Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision without substantive reasoning

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for waiving the written justification of the dismissal because it would not contribute to clarifying the requirements for admitting revision.

§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO

Legal basis cited in the dispositive for imposing the costs of the appeal proceedings on the unsuccessful plaintiff.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 2. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Naumburg vom 10. März 2022 wird zurückgewiesen.

Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).

Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).

Gegenstandswert: 92.496,92 €

Pamp Halfmeier Jurgeleit

Sacher Hannamann