Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VII ZR 43/24 KI-generiert

Admissibility of revision complaint against civil liability judgment

Geschäftsnummer VII ZR 43/24
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) 7th Civil Senate dismissed the defendant's complaint against the non-admission of revision, thereby upholding the Kammergericht's decision and leaving the lower court's judgment in force. This procedural ruling concerns a civil dispute with a subject matter value of up to €950,000, where the defendant failed to demonstrate the prerequisites for a third-instance appeal. The court ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings, including those incurred by the intervenor on the plaintiff's side, while the defendant's intervenor was ordered to bear their own costs. The decision was rendered without a substantive written justification under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, as such an explanation was deemed unnecessary for clarifying the conditions under which revision is admissible.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 101 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Admissibility of revision complaint against civil liability judgment: This procedural ruling concerns a civil dispute with a subject matter value of up to €950,000, where the defendant failed to demonstrate the prerequisites for a third-instance appeal. The court ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings, including those incurred by the intervenor on the plaintiff's side, while the defendant's intervenor was ordered to bear their own costs. The decision was rendered without a substantive written justification under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, as such an explanation was deemed unnecessary for clarifying the conditions under which revision is admissible.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
zivilrechtliche Revision Streitgegenstand privatrechtliche Haftung materielle Begründetheit prozessleitende Verfügungen Klageänderung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 101 Abs. 1 ZPO
Cited to determine that the intervening auxiliary party bears its own costs.
§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO
Cited as the procedural basis for omitting the written justification of the dismissal because such a justification would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting revision.
§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO
Cited to determine the allocation of litigation costs to the losing party.
KI-generiert
VII ZR 92/23
Admissibility of revision in civil proceedings and waiver of reasoned decision
VII ZR 147/22
Admissibility of non-admission of revision complaint in civil proceedings under § 544 ZPO
VII ZR 71/22
Admissibility of complaint against non-admission of revision under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO without reasoned decision
VII ZR 65/22
Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of civil revision without written justification
VII ZR 91/21
Rejection of complaint against non-admission of revision in civil liability dispute without substantive justification under § 544 ZPO

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO

Cited as the procedural basis for omitting the written justification of the dismissal because such a justification would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting revision.

§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited to determine the allocation of litigation costs to the losing party.

§ 101 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited to determine that the intervening auxiliary party bears its own costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 27. Zivilsenats des Kammergerichts vom 8. Februar 2024 wird zurückgewiesen.

Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).

Der Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens, einschließlich der durch die Nebenintervention auf Seiten der Klägerin verursachten Kosten. Der Streithelfer des Beklagten trägt seine Kosten selbst (§ 97 Abs. 1, § 101 Abs. 1 ZPO).

Gegenstandswert: bis 950.000 €

Pamp Halfmeier Graßnack

Borris Hannamann