Waiver of reasoning in non-admission of revision complaint for lack of clarifying potential under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of a revision appeal, leaving the judgment of the Bamberg Higher Regional Court dated March 2, 2023, in force; the plaintiff, who bears the costs of the complaint proceedings, did not prevail. The dispute, valued at €63,296.98, involved a civil law matter previously adjudicated by the 12th Civil Senate of the Oberlandesgericht, where the plaintiff sought to challenge the lower court's decision through a constitutional-level appeal but failed to justify the admission of a further instance. The court ordered a dismissal without substantive reasoning pursuant to § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence, and § 97(1) of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), as such reasoning was deemed unsuitable for clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision appeal.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Waiver of reasoning in non-admission of revision complaint for lack of clarifying potential under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO: The dispute, valued at €63,296.98, involved a civil law matter previously adjudicated by the 12th Civil Senate of the Oberlandesgericht, where the plaintiff sought to challenge the lower court's decision through a constitutional-level appeal but failed to justify the admission of a further instance. The court ordered a dismissal without substantive reasoning pursuant to § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence, and § 97(1) of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), as such reasoning was deemed unsuitable for clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision appeal.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertProvisional basis for waiving the substantive reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint, as the reasoning was deemed unsuitable for clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision.
Basis for imposing the costs of the complaint proceedings on the unsuccessful plaintiff.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 12. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Bamberg vom 2. März 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 63.296,98 €
Halfmeier Kartzke Jurgeleit
Graßnack Sacher