Non-admission of revision: waiver of reasoned decision under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Civil Procedure (BGH) dismissed the defendant's complaint against the non-admission of a revision appeal, thereby allowing the judgment of the 13th Civil Senate of the Higher Regional Court Frankfurt am Main to become final, with the defendants bearing the costs of the proceedings. The dispute concerned a civil claim with a subject matter value of €25,135.18, where the appellate court had declined to admit the constitutional-level revision due to a lack of sufficient legal significance. The court explicitly declined to provide a detailed reasoning under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, as such an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision, and ordered the defendants to pay the procedural costs pursuant to § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Non-admission of revision: waiver of reasoned decision under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO: The dispute concerned a civil claim with a subject matter value of €25,135.18, where the appellate court had declined to admit the constitutional-level revision due to a lack of sufficient legal significance. The court explicitly declined to provide a detailed reasoning under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, as such an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision, and ordered the defendants to pay the procedural costs pursuant to § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertProcedural basis cited to justify the omission of a reasoned decision for the dismissal of the complaint against the non-admission of revision.
Costs rule cited to order the defendants to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 13. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Frankfurt am Main mit Sitz in Darmstadt vom 17. März 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Beklagten tragen die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 25.135,18 €
Pamp Halfmeier Jurgeleit
Graßnack Brenneisen