Dismissal of complaint against refusal to admit revision without reasoning under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe defendant's appeal against the refusal to admit a revision appeal was dismissed, with the defendant ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings, thereby upholding the lower court's decision. The case involved a civil dispute with a subject matter value of €186,300, where the defendant challenged the appellate court's decision to deny leave for a third-instance review. The Federal Court of Justice (7th Civil Senate) rejected the complaint without a substantive written justification, relying on § 544(6) Sentence 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which exempts the court from providing reasons if such an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Dismissal of complaint against refusal to admit revision without reasoning under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO: The case involved a civil dispute with a subject matter value of €186,300, where the defendant challenged the appellate court's decision to deny leave for a third-instance review. The Federal Court of Justice (7th Civil Senate) rejected the complaint without a substantive written justification, relying on § 544(6) Sentence 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which exempts the court from providing reasons if such an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertGround for omitting the written justification for the dismissal of the complaint.
Basis for ordering the losing party to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde des Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 21. Zivilsenats des Kammergerichts vom 25. Februar 2022 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Der Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 186.300 €
Pamp Kartzke Jurgeleit
Sacher Brenneisen