Waiver of reasoning for dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision in civil proceedings
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the defendant's complaint against the non-admission of leave to appeal, leaving the lower court's decision in force and ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings. The dispute concerned a civil matter with a value in dispute of approximately 85,145 euros, where the defendant sought to challenge the appellate court's refusal to allow a revision appeal. The BGH declined to provide a written reasoning, applying the provision that waives a detailed explanation when such a discussion would not contribute to clarifying the criteria for admitting revision appeals under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Waiver of reasoning for dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision in civil proceedings: The dispute concerned a civil matter with a value in dispute of approximately 85,145 euros, where the defendant sought to challenge the appellate court's refusal to allow a revision appeal. The BGH declined to provide a written reasoning, applying the provision that waives a detailed explanation when such a discussion would not contribute to clarifying the criteria for admitting revision appeals under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for waiving the written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint against the non-admission of revision.
Basis for ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Beschluss des 9. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Celle vom 2. Februar 2022 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Streitwert: 85.145,38 €
Pamp Kartzke Jurgeleit
Graßnack Brenneisen