Waiver of reasoning for dismissal of complaint against denial of leave to appeal for revision under § 544(6) ZPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the denial of leave to appeal for revision, thereby upholding the Kammergericht’s decision of 17 January 2023; consequently, the plaintiff bears the costs of the appeal proceedings, including those arising from the defendant's auxiliary intervention. The dispute concerned a civil matter with a value in dispute of approximately €525,589.10, where the appellant sought to establish the admissibility of a revision by demonstrating fundamental legal issues, but failed to meet the statutory requirements. The court explicitly waived providing a substantive reasoning, relying on § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, which permits omitting grounds when they would not contribute to clarifying the conditions under which revision should be granted, and applied §§ 97 Abs. 1 and 101 Abs. 1 ZPO to allocate the procedural costs to the unsuccessful appellant.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 101 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1, § 101 Abs. 1 ZPO; Waiver of reasoning for dismissal of complaint against denial of leave to appeal for revision under § 544(6) ZPO: The dispute concerned a civil matter with a value in dispute of approximately €525,589.10, where the appellant sought to establish the admissibility of a revision by demonstrating fundamental legal issues, but failed to meet the statutory requirements. The court explicitly waived providing a substantive reasoning, relying on § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, which permits omitting grounds when they would not contribute to clarifying the conditions under which revision should be granted, and applied §§ 97 Abs. 1 and 101 Abs. 1 ZPO to allocate the procedural costs to the unsuccessful appellant.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for omitting the written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint against the denial of leave to appeal for revision.
Basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings, including those arising from the defendant's auxiliary intervention.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Beschluss des 27. Zivilsenats des Kammergerichts vom17. Januar 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens einschließlich der durch die Nebenintervention auf Seiten der Beklagten entstandenen Kosten (§ 97 Abs. 1, § 101 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 525.589,10 €
Pamp Kartzke Jurgeleit
Sacher Brenneisen