Dismissal of complaint against refusal to admit revision; waiver of reasoned grounds for non-contributory clarification of admissibility requirements.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the denial of leave to appeal, thereby upholding the final judgment of the Bamberg Higher Regional Court and leaving the defendant as the prevailing party. The dispute concerned a civil matter where the plaintiff sought to challenge the lower court's decision through a non-admission of revision proceeding, failing to demonstrate sufficient importance to justify appellate review. The court applied § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO to waive a detailed written justification for the dismissal, as it would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision, and imposed the costs of the proceedings on the plaintiff pursuant to § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO, setting the amount in dispute at 22,899.50 euros.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Dismissal of complaint against refusal to admit revision; waiver of reasoned grounds for non-contributory clarification of admissibility requirements: The dispute concerned a civil matter where the plaintiff sought to challenge the lower court's decision through a non-admission of revision proceeding, failing to demonstrate sufficient importance to justify appellate review. The court applied § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO to waive a detailed written justification for the dismissal, as it would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision, and imposed the costs of the proceedings on the plaintiff pursuant to § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO, setting the amount in dispute at 22,899.50 euros.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for waiving the written reasoning because it would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision.
Basis for ordering the losing plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 12. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Bamberg vom 2. Februar 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 22.899,50 €
Pamp
Jurgeleit
Graßnack
Borris
Brenneisen