Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision without substantive reasoning

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the defendant's complaint against the non-admission of appeal, thereby leaving the judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Celle in force; the defendant bears the costs of the proceedings, and the subject value is fixed at €90,966.80. This decision arose from a civil dispute where the defendant sought to challenge the lower court's refusal to allow a revision appeal, but the BGH declined to provide a substantive reasoning, relying on the statutory provision that a justification would not contribute to clarifying the preconditions for admitting a revision. The ruling is based on § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, which permits the omission of a reasoned decision in non-admission cases, and § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO for the allocation of procedural costs.