Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VII ZR 95/22 ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:240822BVIIZR95.22.0 KI-generiert

Late justification of complaint against non-admission of revision

Geschäftsnummer VII ZR 95/22
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the defendant's complaint against the non-admission of revision, upholding the prior appellate judgment and ordering the complaint to be on the defendant's costs. The case involved a civil dispute with a matter in dispute valued at up to €40,000, where the appellate court had previously decided not to allow the appeal to the highest court. The dismissal was based on procedural grounds, specifically the failure to file the justification for the complaint within the statutory deadline, pursuant to §§ 544(4) and 97(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO).

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 544 Abs. 4, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Late justification of complaint against non-admission of revision: The case involved a civil dispute with a matter in dispute valued at up to €40,000, where the appellate court had previously decided not to allow the appeal to the highest court. The dismissal was based on procedural grounds, specifically the failure to file the justification for the complaint within the statutory deadline, pursuant to §§ 544(4) and 97(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO).

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Revision eines Entscheids Streitgegenstand gesetzliche Verfahrensfrist Zivilprozessordnung gesetzliche Voraussetzungen Verspätungsausschluss

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 544 Abs. 4, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO
Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for dismissing the complaint because it was not justified in time.
KI-generiert
VII ZR 225/23
Timely reasoning requirement for complaint against non-admission of revision
VII ZR 152/25
Timeliness of justification for complaint against non-admission of revision in civil proceedings
VII ZR 226/22
Dismissal of complaint for non-admission of revision without reasoning under § 544(6) ZPO
VII ZR 880/21
Non-admission of Revision: waiver of justification under § 544(6) ZPO
VII ZR 549/21
Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision: waiver of justification under § 544(6) Sentence 2 ZPO

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 544 Abs. 4, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for dismissing the complaint because it was not justified in time.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten zu 4 gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 6. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Celle vom 4. April 2022 wird auf seine Kosten verworfen, weil die Beschwerde nicht rechtzeitig begründet worden ist (§ 544 Abs. 4, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).

Streitwert: bis 40.000 €

Halfmeier Jurgeleit Graßnack

Sacher Brenneisen