Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VII ZR 114/23 KI-generiert

Cost allocation and omission of reasoning for dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision under §§ 544, 97 ZPO

Geschäftsnummer VII ZR 114/23
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the auxiliary intervener's complaint against the denial of leave to appeal, thereby upholding the lower court's decision and leaving the original judgment in force, with the intervener bearing the litigation costs for a subject matter in dispute of €86,385.74. The case involved a civil dispute where the appellate court had refused to allow a revision appeal, and the BGH declined to provide a reasoned decision because one would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision under § 544(6) sentence 2, second alternative, of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO). The decision is based on procedural law governing leave to appeal, specifically the standard for when a reasoned opinion is unnecessary to maintain the status quo of the denied revision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO; Cost allocation and omission of reasoning for dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision under §§ 544, 97 ZPO: The case involved a civil dispute where the appellate court had refused to allow a revision appeal, and the BGH declined to provide a reasoned decision because one would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision under § 544(6) sentence 2, second alternative, of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO). The decision is based on procedural law governing leave to appeal, specifically the standard for when a reasoned opinion is unnecessary to maintain the status quo of the denied revision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Revision eines Entscheids Streitgegenstand Zivilprozessverfahren Verfahrenskosten Ersatzstrafe E-Justice

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO
Legal basis for imposing the costs of the complaint proceedings on the losing party.
§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO
Procedural basis cited to justify the omission of a written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint.
KI-generiert
VII ZR 84/23
Non-admission of revision: omitting reasoning for complaint against leave to appeal
VII ZR 33/23
Waiver of reasoning for dismissal of complaint against denial of leave to appeal for revision under § 544(6) ZPO
VII ZR 439/21
Non-admission of leave to appeal: omission of reasoning justified by irrelevance to clarifying revision admissibility
VII ZR 140/22
Waiver of revision justification and cost allocation for non-admission of appeal under §§ 544, 97, 101 ZPO
VII ZR 465/21
Discretion to omit reasoning when dismissing complaint against non-admission of revision under § 544(6) ZPO

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO

Procedural basis cited to justify the omission of a written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint.

§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO

Legal basis for imposing the costs of the complaint proceedings on the losing party.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Die für die Klägerin geführte Beschwerde ihrer Streithelferin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Beschluss des 12. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Bamberg vom 25. April 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.

Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).

Die Streithelferin der Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).

Gegenstandswert: 86.385,74 €

Pamp Halfmeier Graßnack

Sacher Borris