Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VII ZR 173/22 KI-generiert

Objection to non-admission of revision: Justification omission under § 544(6) No. 2 ZPO

Geschäftsnummer VII ZR 173/22
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Civil Procedure dismissed the defendant's complaint against the non-admission of revision by the Higher Regional Court, thereby upholding the lower court's denial of appellate review and leaving the prior judgment in force. The dispute concerned a civil matter with a subject matter value of €40,313.46, in which the defendant argued that the appeal to the Federal Court should have been admitted, but the court found no merit in these arguments. The decision was issued without a detailed written justification because the court determined that such a rationale would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting revision, a procedure governed by § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO, while the costs of the proceedings were allocated to the defendant pursuant to § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO; Objection to non-admission of revision: Justification omission under § 544(6) No. 2 ZPO: The dispute concerned a civil matter with a subject matter value of €40,313.46, in which the defendant argued that the appeal to the Federal Court should have been admitted, but the court found no merit in these arguments. The decision was issued without a detailed written justification because the court determined that such a rationale would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting revision, a procedure governed by § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO, while the costs of the proceedings were allocated to the defendant pursuant to § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Revision eines Entscheids Streitgegenstand Unterlassungsdelikt Rückzug des Revisionsgesuchs Verstossung Verfahrensrügen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO
Used to allocate the costs of the legal remedy proceedings to the defendant.
§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO
Justifies the omission of a written justification in the dispositive order dismissing the complaint against the non-admission of revision.
KI-generiert
VII ZR 127/24
Non-admission of revision: Omission of reasoning under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO where justification would not clarify admissibility prerequisites
VII ZR 339/21
Omission of reasoning on complaint against non-admission of revision under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO
VII ZR 121/20
Objection to non-admission of revision: waiver of justification under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO
VII ZR 315/21
Non-admission of revision: Omission of reasoning permitted where it would not clarify prerequisites under § 544(6) Sentence 2 ZPO
VII ZR 880/21
Non-admission of Revision: waiver of justification under § 544(6) ZPO

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO

Justifies the omission of a written justification in the dispositive order dismissing the complaint against the non-admission of revision.

§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO

Used to allocate the costs of the legal remedy proceedings to the defendant.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revisi-on in dem Beschluss des 23. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Düs-seldorf vom 5. September 2022 wird zurückgewiesen.

Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Re-vision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).

Die Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).

Gegenstandswert: 40.313,46 €

Pamp

Halfmeier

Jurgeleit

Graßnack

Sacher