Dismissal of complaint for leave to appeal under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO without reasoned decision
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice dismissed the plaintiff's complaint for leave to appeal, thereby upholding the Oberlandesgericht Köln's decision to refuse leave to appeal against the underlying judgment of 8 November 2023; no reasoned decision was provided as it was deemed unnecessary for clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO. The dispute, involving a subject value of €72,855.93, concerned a civil law matter where the plaintiff sought to challenge the appellate court's rejection of a revision petition. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 Halbsatz 2 ZPO, which permits the court to omit a written justification for dismissing a complaint for leave to appeal when such a justification would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting a revision, alongside § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO regarding the plaintiff's obligation to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO; Dismissal of complaint for leave to appeal under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO without reasoned decision: 6 Satz 2 ZPO. The dispute, involving a subject value of €72,855.93, concerned a civil law matter where the plaintiff sought to challenge the appellate court's rejection of a revision petition. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 Halbsatz 2 ZPO, which permits the court to omit a written justification for dismissing a complaint for leave to appeal when such a justification would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting a revision, alongside § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO regarding the plaintiff's obligation to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertJustification for omitting the written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint because it would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting revision.
Basis for ordering the appellant to bear the costs of the proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 16. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Köln vom 8. November 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 72.855,93 €
Pamp Halfmeier Graßnack
Sacher Borris