Waiver of reasoning for dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the defendant's complaint against the non-admission of revision, leaving the judgment of the 15th Civil Senate of the Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe of April 5, 2023, in force; the plaintiff prevailed, and the defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings, including those arising from the auxiliary intervention on the plaintiff's side, with a subject matter value of €17,000,000. The dispute concerned a civil litigation matter where the defendant challenged the lower court's refusal to allow an appeal to the supreme court, but the BGH found no grounds to reopen the review of the first-instance decision. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, under which the court waived a reasoned decision because a detailed explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision, thereby upholding the procedural standard for non-admission in high-value commercial or civil disputes.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 101 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Waiver of reasoning for dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision: The dispute concerned a civil litigation matter where the defendant challenged the lower court's refusal to allow an appeal to the supreme court, but the BGH found no grounds to reopen the review of the first-instance decision. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, under which the court waived a reasoned decision because a detailed explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision, thereby upholding the procedural standard for non-admission in high-value commercial or civil disputes.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertJustifies the dismissal of the complaint against non-admission of revision and the waiver of a reasoned decision.
Basis for ordering the losing party to bear the costs of the opposing party's legal representation.
Basis for allocating the costs of the auxiliary intervention to the losing party.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 15. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Karlsruhe vom 5. April 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens einschließlich der durch die Nebenintervention auf Seiten der Klägerin entstandenen Kosten (§ 97 Abs. 1, § 101 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 17.000.000 €
Halfmeier Jurgeleit Graßnack
Sacher Brenneisen