Waiver of reasoned decision on non-admission of revision under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe defendant’s complaint for leave to appeal (Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde) was dismissed, thereby upholding the judgment of the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court (12th Civil Senate) and leaving that decision final. The dispute concerned a civil matter where the lower court had refused to admit revision, and the appellant challenged this procedural refusal; the Federal Court of Justice (BGH, 7th Civil Senate) rejected the challenge without providing a substantive reasoned decision, finding it unnecessary to clarify the prerequisites for admitting an appeal. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, which permits dispensing with a statement of reasons in non-appeal admission decisions if such a statement would not contribute to the clarification of the relevant legal conditions. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings, including those caused by the auxiliary intervention on the plaintiff’s side, except for the auxiliary intervenor’s own costs, pursuant to §§ 97 Abs. 1 and 101 Abs. 1 ZPO.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 101 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 101 Abs. 1 ZPO; Waiver of reasoned decision on non-admission of revision under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO: The dispute concerned a civil matter where the lower court had refused to admit revision, and the appellant challenged this procedural refusal; the Federal Court of Justice (BGH, 7th Civil Senate) rejected the challenge without providing a substantive reasoned decision, finding it unnecessary to clarify the prerequisites for admitting an appeal. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, which permits dispensing with a statement of reasons in non-appeal admission decisions if such a statement would not contribute to the clarification of the relevant legal conditions. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings, including those caused by the auxiliary intervention on the plaintiff’s side, except for the auxiliary intervenor’s own costs, pursuant to §§ 97 Abs. 1 and 101 Abs. 1 ZPO.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for dispensing with a reasoned decision in the dismissal of the complaint for leave to appeal.
Provisions governing the allocation of costs, specifically mandating that the losing party bears the costs of the opposing side's auxiliary intervention.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde des Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 12. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Stuttgart vom 25. März 2022 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Der Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens einschließlich der durch die Nebenintervention auf Klägerseite verursachten Kosten, jedoch mit Ausnahme der Kosten der Streithelferin des Beklagten, die diese selbst trägt (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 101 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: bis 110.000 €
Pamp Halfmeier Kartzke
Sacher Borris