Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision without reasoned judgment under § 544(6) ZPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Justice dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of the appeal on points of law, thereby leaving the judgment of the Cologne Higher Regional Court of first instance in force and ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings. The dispute concerned a civil matter with a value in dispute of approximately €122,700, wherein the plaintiff sought to have the lower court's decision reversed via a legal appeal. The court refused to provide a written reasoned judgment for the dismissal, relying on § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, on the grounds that such an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites under which an appeal on points of law is admissible.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision without reasoned judgment under § 544(6) ZPO: The dispute concerned a civil matter with a value in dispute of approximately €122,700, wherein the plaintiff sought to have the lower court's decision reversed via a legal appeal. The court refused to provide a written reasoned judgment for the dismissal, relying on § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, on the grounds that such an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites under which an appeal on points of law is admissible.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertJustified the court's decision to dispense with a written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint, as it was not suitable for clarifying the requirements for admitting revision.
Basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 3. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Köln vom 31. Januar 2019 in der Fassung des Berichtigungsbeschlusses vom 7. Februar 2019 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 122.715,05 €
Pamp Halfmeier Kartzke
Jurgeleit Sacher