Admissibility of revision: Justification of non-admission by § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO and cost allocation under § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice rejected the defendant's complaint against the non-admission of revision, thereby upholding the appellate court's order and leaving the lower instance judgment in force; the defendant bears the costs of the complaint proceedings. The dispute arose from a civil matter involving a disputed value of €29,880, where the defendant challenged the Regional Court of Appeal's decision not to allow an appeal on points of law to the Supreme Court. The court’s decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, under which a reasoned explanation for the dismissal was dispensed with because such an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision, resulting in an automatic rejection of the complaint.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Admissibility of revision: Justification of non-admission by § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO and cost allocation under § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO: The dispute arose from a civil matter involving a disputed value of €29,880, where the defendant challenged the Regional Court of Appeal's decision not to allow an appeal on points of law to the Supreme Court. The court’s decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, under which a reasoned explanation for the dismissal was dispensed with because such an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision, resulting in an automatic rejection of the complaint.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertLegal basis for dispensing with the written reasoning for the rejection of the complaint because it would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting revision.
Provision applied to order the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Beschluss des 3. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Koblenz vom 7. Oktober 2024 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 29.880 €
Pamp Jurgeleit Graßnack
Sacher Hannamann