Dismissal of complaint against refusal to admit revision due to lack of substantiality in justification
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the higher regional court's refusal to allow revision, thereby upholding the prior procedural decision and leaving the lower court's ruling on the merits in force. This procedural appeal concerned the admissibility of a final review of a civil dispute involving a material claim valued at approximately €29,674, where the plaintiff challenged the second instance court's determination that no fundamental legal question justified further appeal. The court invoked Section 544 (6) sentence 2, second half-sentence, of the Code of Civil Procedure to dispense with a substantive written reasoning, concluding that an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the conditions under which revision proceedings are to be admitted, while ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings under Section 97 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Dismissal of complaint against refusal to admit revision due to lack of substantiality in justification: This procedural appeal concerned the admissibility of a final review of a civil dispute involving a material claim valued at approximately €29,674, where the plaintiff challenged the second instance court's determination that no fundamental legal question justified further appeal. The court invoked Section 544 (6) sentence 2, second half-sentence, of the Code of Civil Procedure to dispense with a substantive written reasoning, concluding that an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the conditions under which revision proceedings are to be admitted, while ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings under Section 97 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertLegal basis for dispensing with a substantive written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint because such reasoning would not clarify the conditions for admitting revision.
Provision applied to order the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Beschluss des 2. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Naumburg vom 22. Dezember 2020 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 29.673,68 €
Pamp Kartzke Graßnack
Sacher Borris