Discretionary waiver of reasoning for dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Justice (7th Civil Senate) dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the lower appellate court's refusal to admit a revision appeal, leaving the prior order in force and condemning the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings; the court explicitly waived a written reasoning as it would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision. The dispute involved a civil matter with a subject matter value of €343,009.74, where the plaintiff challenged the procedural decision denying access to the supreme court instance. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, second half, ZPO, which permits the court to omit a detailed justification for dismissing a non-admission complaint if such justification is deemed unnecessary for defining the conditions under which a revision appeal is admissible.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Discretionary waiver of reasoning for dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO: The dispute involved a civil matter with a subject matter value of €343,009.74, where the plaintiff challenged the procedural decision denying access to the supreme court instance. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, second half, ZPO, which permits the court to omit a detailed justification for dismissing a non-admission complaint if such justification is deemed unnecessary for defining the conditions under which a revision appeal is admissible.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited to justify the court's decision to omit a written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint because it would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting a revision.
Cited as the basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Beschluss des 6. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Nürnberg vom 9. Mai 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 343.009,74 €
Pamp Halfmeier Jurgeleit
Graßnack Hannamann