Non-acceptance of revision in civil liability dispute; waiver of reasoned dismissal under § 544 para. 6 sent. 2 alt. 2 ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) 7th Civil Senate dismissed the defendant's complaint for non-acceptance of leave to appeal, thereby confirming the lower court's refusal to admit the revision and leaving the judgment of the Oberlandesgericht Naumburg of June 7, 2024, in force. The dispute, involving a claim worth approximately €551,794.71, centered on a civil liability matter where the defendant challenged the appellate court's decision not to grant leave for a further appeal. The court ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings and waived the written justification for the decision, as it deemed the grounds insufficient to clarify the prerequisites for admitting a revision under § 544 para. 6 sentence 2 second alternative ZPO.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Non-acceptance of revision in civil liability dispute; waiver of reasoned dismissal under § 544 para. 6 sent. 2 alt. 2 ZPO: The dispute, involving a claim worth approximately €551,794.71, centered on a civil liability matter where the defendant challenged the appellate court's decision not to grant leave for a further appeal. The court ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings and waived the written justification for the decision, as it deemed the grounds insufficient to clarify the prerequisites for admitting a revision under § 544 para. 6 sentence 2 second alternative ZPO.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited as the basis for waiving the written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint.
Cited to order the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 2. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Naumburg vom 7. Juni 2024 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 551.794,71 €
Pamp Halfmeier Graßnack
Sacher Hannamann