BGH rejects non-admission complaint for revision under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO without substantive reasoning

The Federal Court of Justice dismissed the defendant's complaint for non-admission of revision, thereby upholding the lower court's decision and leaving the judgment of the Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe in force, with the defendant ordered to bear the costs of the appellate proceedings. The dispute concerned a civil matter where the defendant sought to challenge the regional court's refusal to admit a revision appeal, and the court declined to provide a detailed written reasoning, citing that such a justification would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO. The decisive legal basis involved the procedural standard for dismissing non-admission complaints without substantive reasoning when the criteria for opening a revision trial are not sufficiently indicated, coupled with cost allocation under § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO.