VII ZR 1/22 · Dismissal of non-admission complaint where justification omitted to avoid clarifying revision prerequisites under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO (BGH 7. Zivilsenat)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Justice dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of the legal appeal (Revision) and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings, leaving the lower court's judgment in force. The case involved a dispute valued at €68,326.03 where the plaintiff challenged the 6th Civil Senate of the Higher Regional Court Dresden's refusal to grant the higher instance review. The court denied a written justification for the dismissal pursuant to § 544 (6) sentence 2, second half-sentence, and § 97 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), determining that providing reasons would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting an appeal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Dismissal of non-admission complaint where justification omitted to avoid clarifying revision prerequisites under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO: The case involved a dispute valued at €68,326.03 where the plaintiff challenged the 6th Civil Senate of the Higher Regional Court Dresden's refusal to grant the higher instance review. The court denied a written justification for the dismissal pursuant to § 544 (6) sentence 2, second half-sentence, and § 97 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), determining that providing reasons would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting an appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

Revision eines Entscheids Zivilprozessordnung formelle Verfahrenseinstellung Verweisungsbruch Fall des Ausschlusses Rückzug des Strafantrags

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert

§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO

Cited as the procedural basis for dismissing the complaint without providing a written justification, determining that reasons would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting the revision.

§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited as the basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.

KI-generiert

VII ZR 177/22

Dismissal of non-admission complaint where reasoning omission is justified by irrelevance to clarifying revision admission criteria

VII ZR 226/22

Dismissal of complaint for non-admission of revision without reasoning under § 544(6) ZPO

VII ZR 884/21

Denial of reasoning for dismissal of non-admission complaint under § 544(6)(2) ZPO

VII ZR 661/21

Dismissal of non-admission complaint without reasoning under § 544 ZPO

VII ZR 37/19

Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision without reasoned judgment under § 544(6) ZPO

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert

§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO

Cited as the procedural basis for dismissing the complaint without providing a written justification, determining that reasons would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting the revision.

§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited as the basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.

Volltext

Die Beschwerde des Klägers gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 6. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Dresden vom 7. Dezember 2021 wird zurückgewiesen.

Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).

Der Kläger trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).

Gegenstandswert: 68.326,03 €

Pamp Kartzke Graßnack

Sacher Borris

Dismissal of non-admission complaint where justification omitted to avoid clarifying revision prerequisites under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 ZPO

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

Legislator-Regeste

Schlagwörter

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

Verwandte Entscheide

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Volltext