Non-admission of revision: waiver of written justification and cost allocation in auxiliary intervention proceedings under §§ 544, 97, 101 ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice dismissed the defendant's complaint against the non-admission of revision, thereby upholding the lower court's final judgment in favor of the plaintiff and ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings, including those incurred through the plaintiff's auxiliary intervention. The dispute, valued at €62,679.88, arose from a civil litigation where the defendant sought to challenge the Oberlandesgericht Koblenz's decision not to admit the appeal to the higher instance. The court declined to provide a written justification for the dismissal pursuant to § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, determining that a reasoning would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites under which revision is to be admitted, thereby leaving the appellate decision intact.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 101 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1, § 101 Abs. 1 ZPO; Non-admission of revision: waiver of written justification and cost allocation in auxiliary intervention proceedings under §§ 544, 97, 101 ZPO: The dispute, valued at €62,679.88, arose from a civil litigation where the defendant sought to challenge the Oberlandesgericht Koblenz's decision not to admit the appeal to the higher instance. The court declined to provide a written justification for the dismissal pursuant to § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, determining that a reasoning would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites under which revision is to be admitted, thereby leaving the appellate decision intact.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for the court's decision to refrain from providing a written justification for the dismissal of the complaint.
Legal basis for ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings, including those incurred by the auxiliary intervenor.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde des Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 2. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Koblenz vom 24. Juni 2021 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Der Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens einschließlich der durch die Nebenintervention auf Seiten der Klägerin entstandenen Kosten (§ 97 Abs. 1, § 101 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 62.679,88 €
Pamp Halfmeier Kartzke
Jurgeleit Sacher