Waiver of reasoning for dismissing complaint against non-allowance of revision where clarification of admission conditions is not contributed
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) 7th Civil Senate dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the non-allowance of revision in a judgment by the 10th Civil Senate of the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court, leaving the lower court’s decision in force and ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings; the court explicitly waived the provision of a detailed reasoning under Section 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), as such an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting an appeal. The dispute involved a civil matter with an amount in dispute of €396,361.43, where the plaintiff challenged the appellate court’s refusal to grant permission for a constitutional-level review based on alleged procedural or substantive errors, but failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for revision under the relevant ZPO provisions.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Waiver of reasoning for dismissing complaint against non-allowance of revision where clarification of admission conditions is not contributed: The dispute involved a civil matter with an amount in dispute of €396,361.43, where the plaintiff challenged the appellate court’s refusal to grant permission for a constitutional-level review based on alleged procedural or substantive errors, but failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for revision under the relevant ZPO provisions.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertJustifies the court's decision to waive the written reasoning for the dismissal as it would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting an appeal.
Establishes the basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 10. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Stuttgart vom 17. März 2020 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 396.361,43 €
Pamp Halfmeier Jurgeleit
Graßnack Borris