Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
10 AZR 35/20 ECLI:DE:BAG:2021:160621.U.10AZR35.20.0 KI-generiert

Employment Law: Rejection of Revision Challenge to Labor Court Judgment

Geschäftsnummer 10 AZR 35/20
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Labor Court (BAG) dismissed the plaintiff's revision, thereby affirming the decision of the Munich Regional Labor Court and leaving the lower court judgment in force, with the plaintiff ordered to bear the costs of the revision proceedings. The case concerned a dispute over employment law claims, likely involving the validity of a termination or a related statutory entitlement, which the plaintiff challenged after failing to secure a favorable outcome at the appellate level. The court's final determination rested on the established legal principles governing the specific employment claim at issue, finding that the plaintiff's arguments did not warrant a reversal of the lower court's assessment under the applicable provisions of German labor law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 92 Abs. 1 ZPO; Employment Law: Rejection of Revision Challenge to Labor Court Judgment: The case concerned a dispute over employment law claims, likely involving the validity of a termination or a related statutory entitlement, which the plaintiff challenged after failing to secure a favorable outcome at the appellate level. The court's final determination rested on the established legal principles governing the specific employment claim at issue, finding that the plaintiff's arguments did not warrant a reversal of the lower court's assessment under the applicable provisions of German labor law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Revision eines Entscheids Beendigung des Arbeitsverhältnisses Arbeitsstreitigkeiten konnexe Verfahren Arbeitsnorm Verfahrensrügen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO
Basis for the dismissal of the revision and the resulting cost allocation.
§ 92 Abs. 1 ZPO
Basis for the order that the plaintiff bears the costs of the revision.
KI-generiert
10 AZR 832/09
Labor dispute: Final rejection of revision challenging employment law judgment
10 AZR 34/20
Rejection of labor-law revision appeal challenging prior instance judgment
6 AZR 811/12
Labor law: Federal Labor Court rejects revision on employment dispute merits, upholding lower court judgment
3 AZR 219/09
Employment law dispute: Rejection of employer’s revision challenging lower court’s labor rights ruling
6 AZR 408/15
Labor law dispute: Rejection of employee's revision challenging prior instance judgment

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO

Basis for the dismissal of the revision and the resulting cost allocation.

§ 92 Abs. 1 ZPO

Basis for the order that the plaintiff bears the costs of the revision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts München vom 13. November 2019 - 11 Sa 379/19 - wird zurückgewiesen.

2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.