Admissibility of labor law revision against final second-instance judgment

The Federal Labor Court (BAG) dismissed the plaintiff's revision, thereby upholding the lower court's judgment against him and leaving the second-instance decision in force, with the plaintiff ordered to bear the costs of the revision proceedings. The dispute centered on a labor law claim where the plaintiff, having lost in the Land Labor Court of Rhineland-Palatinate, appealed to the BAG to challenge the finality of that adverse ruling. The court's decision was based on the procedural grounds of the revision appeal, concluding that the plaintiff failed to establish any legal error or significant factual deficiency in the lower court's assessment, resulting in a complete loss for the employee-claimant on the merits.