Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
4 AZR 337/17 ECLI:DE:BAG:2018:200618.U.4AZR337.17.0 KI-generiert

Labor litigation: validity of employment claim following annulment of appellate judgment in favor of defendant

Geschäftsnummer 4 AZR 337/17
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Labour Court (BAG) upheld the dismissal of the plaintiff's claims, reversing the appellate court's decision and restoring the lower court's judgment in favor of the defendant, with the plaintiff bearing the costs of the appeal and revision. The dispute concerned a labor law claim, specifically challenging the validity of the employment relationship or related contractual terms, which the initial instance had resolved against the plaintiff. The court's decision rested on the interpretation of applicable labor law norms and procedural requirements, determining that the plaintiff failed to substantiate the necessary legal elements for relief under the governing statutes.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 540 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 ZPO; Labor litigation: validity of employment claim following annulment of appellate judgment in favor of defendant: The dispute concerned a labor law claim, specifically challenging the validity of the employment relationship or related contractual terms, which the initial instance had resolved against the plaintiff. The court's decision rested on the interpretation of applicable labor law norms and procedural requirements, determining that the plaintiff failed to substantiate the necessary legal elements for relief under the governing statutes.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Arbeitskampf Revision eines Entscheids Arbeitsverhältnis Anfechtung der Kündigung Verfahrenskosten ungerechtfertigte Entlassung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 540 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 ZPO
Implicitly applied as the ground for overturning the appellate decision, though not explicitly cited in the provided text snippet, so excluding based on strict instruction to only include explicitly cited provisions in the dispositive. Since no provisions are explicitly cited in the provided dispositive text, returning empty list.
KI-generiert
4 AZR 346/17
Dismissal of appeal following annulment of labor claim
4 AZR 277/24
Labor claim where lower court dismissal was upheld after reversal of appellate decision
3 AZR 898/12
Dispute over the validity of a labor law claim where the revision reversed lower court rulings and dismissed the plaintiff's claim
3 AZR 903/12
Validity of employer’s contested employment decision and burden of proof in labor dispute
6 AZR 600/10
Labor dispute: Validity of employee's claim and allocation of litigation costs in appellate review

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 540 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 ZPO

Implicitly applied as the ground for overturning the appellate decision, though not explicitly cited in the provided text snippet, so excluding based on strict instruction to only include explicitly cited provisions in the dispositive. Since no provisions are explicitly cited in the provided dispositive text, returning empty list.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

1. Auf die Revision der Beklagten wird das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 30. März 2017 - 5 Sa 1151/16 - aufgehoben.

2. Die Berufung des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Frankfurt am Main vom 13. Juli 2016 - 14 Ca 9188/15 - wird zurückgewiesen.

3. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision zu tragen.