Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
9 AZR 388/16 ECLI:DE:BAG:2017:140217.U.9AZR388.16.0 KI-generiert

Validity of termination for social reasons and proportionality review under the Protection Against Dismissal Act

Geschäftsnummer 9 AZR 388/16
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal, upholding the lower court's judgment and ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the appellate proceedings. The dispute concerned a labor law matter, specifically the termination of the employment relationship, where the plaintiff challenged the validity of the dismissal. The decisive legal basis involved the assessment of the proportionality and social justification of the termination under the German Protection Against Dismissal Act (KSchG), with the court finding that the dismissal was legally effective and compliant with statutory requirements.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 93 ZPO; Validity of termination for social reasons and proportionality review under the Protection Against Dismissal Act: The dispute concerned a labor law matter, specifically the termination of the employment relationship, where the plaintiff challenged the validity of the dismissal. The decisive legal basis involved the assessment of the proportionality and social justification of the termination under the German Protection Against Dismissal Act (KSchG), with the court finding that the dismissal was legally effective and compliant with statutory requirements.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Beendigung des Arbeitsverhältnisses Wirtschaftsrecht Arbeitskampf Gesetzlicher Schutz Verhältnismässigkeitserfordernisse gesetzliche Grundlage

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 93 ZPO
Procedural basis for the apportionment of litigation costs, obligating the unsuccessful plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision proceedings.
KI-generiert
4 AZR 256/15
Validity of disciplinary dismissal and social justification under German labor protection law
4 AZR 230/13
Operational justification for termination of employment and its validity under dismissal protection law
10 AZR 223/17
Dispute over the social justification of an employee dismissal under the German Protection Against Dismissal Act (Kündigungsschutz)
4 AZR 218/13
Validity of dismissal under German Protection Against Dismissal Act: Substantive and procedural requirements for injunctive relief against employee termination
6 AZR 7/12
Validity of termination of employment contract; failure to substantiate grounds for dismissal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 93 ZPO

Procedural basis for the apportionment of litigation costs, obligating the unsuccessful plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Saarland vom 2. März 2016 - 1 Sa 54/15 - wird zurückgewiesen.

2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.