Inadmissibility of revision due to missing statement of facts and reasons in social cash holiday pay reimbursement dispute

The Federal Labour Court (BAG) dismissed the revisions of both the plaintiff and the defendant as inadmissible, thereby upholding the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court and ordering the plaintiff to bear 20% and the defendant 80% of the revision costs. The dispute concerned the reimbursement of holiday pay by a social cash (Sozialkasse), a specialized social benefits fund, where the parties challenged the lower court's decision through appeal. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was procedural inadmissibility, specifically that the lower court's judgment lacked the required factual findings (Tatbestand) and decision reasons (Entscheidungsgründe), rendering the revision petition insufficiently substantiated to meet the statutory requirements for appellate review.