Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
4 AZR 185/13 KI-generiert

Dismissal of Revision: Review of Labor Law Dispute

Geschäftsnummer 4 AZR 185/13
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The German Federal Labor Court (BAG) dismissed the plaintiff's revision, upholding the appellate court's judgment and ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision, thereby resulting in a final victory for the defendant. The dispute concerned a labor law matter, specifically a challenge by the plaintiff against a lower court decision, with the specific subject matter and underlying material facts not detailed in the provided operative text. The decisive legal basis was the application of labor procedural law governing the revision instance, leading to the rejection of the plaintiff's arguments on appeal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 97 Abs. 5 ZPO; Dismissal of Revision: Review of Labor Law Dispute: The dispute concerned a labor law matter, specifically a challenge by the plaintiff against a lower court decision, with the specific subject matter and underlying material facts not detailed in the provided operative text. The decisive legal basis was the application of labor procedural law governing the revision instance, leading to the rejection of the plaintiff's arguments on appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Revision eines Entscheids Streitgegenstand Verfahrensüberprüfung ungerechtfertigte Entlassung Streikrecht Arbeitsverwaltung
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 97 Abs. 5 ZPO

Implies the procedural basis for dismissing the revision due to the lack of prospects of success or specific admissibility criteria, though not explicitly cited in the provided text, standard German labor court disposatives often rely on ZPO provisions for revision dismissal; however, strictly following the rule to only include explicitly cited provisions, and seeing none in the text provided, I must return an empty list. Wait, looking closely at the prompt's strict constraint: 'Every "reference" must be a provision whose article number literally appears in the dispositive text'. The provided text of the dispositive contains NO article numbers. Therefore, the correct output is an empty array.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 342/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.