Labor dispute over the validity of a lower court judgment's application of substantive labor law norms in a revision proceeding.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Labor Court (BAG) rejected the plaintiff’s revision, thereby upholding the lower court’s judgment and leaving the defendant as the prevailing party; the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the appellate proceedings. The dispute concerned a labor law matter where the plaintiff challenged the outcome of the instance before the Regional Labor Court, but the appellate court found no grounds to disturb the prior ruling. The decisive legal basis was the court’s determination that the appeal did not reveal errors in the lower court’s application of substantive labor law norms or procedural requirements sufficient to warrant a reversal, resulting in the final affirmation of the judgment against the plaintiff.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLabor dispute over the validity of a lower court judgment's application of substantive labor law norms in a revision proceeding: Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg vom 26. Oktober 2012 - 7 Sa 107/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
1. Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg vom 26. Oktober 2012 - 7 Sa 107/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.
2. Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.