Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
5 AZR 408/12 KI-generiert

Insolvency enforcement: Admissibility of wage claim attachment and exclusion of offset defense in civil execution proceedings

Geschäftsnummer 5 AZR 408/12
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the employer's appeal, upholding the lower court's judgment in favor of the employee and ordering the employer to bear the litigation costs of the appellate instance. The dispute concerned a civil enforcement proceeding initiated by the employee to recover unpaid wages following an insolvency of the employer. The central legal issue was whether the employer could rely on the doctrine of "Wandelschutz" (protection against enforcement through offsetting) to prevent the attachment and sale of assets, or whether the statutory provisions on insolvency and wage claims took precedence, effectively barring the defense and validating the enforcement measures taken by the employee.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 269 Abs. 2 ZPO; Insolvency enforcement: Admissibility of wage claim attachment and exclusion of offset defense in civil execution proceedings: The dispute concerned a civil enforcement proceeding initiated by the employee to recover unpaid wages following an insolvency of the employer. The central legal issue was whether the employer could rely on the doctrine of "Wandelschutz" (protection against enforcement through offsetting) to prevent the attachment and sale of assets, or whether the statutory provisions on insolvency and wage claims took precedence, effectively barring the defense and validating the enforcement measures taken by the employee.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vollstreckungskosten Zivilurteil Kündigungsschutz Zahlungsunfähigkeit Betreibung auf Pfändung Arbeitskampf

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 269 Abs. 2 ZPO

The rejection of the revision is based on this provision, which governs the court's authority to dismiss an appeal if it is evidently without success or the lower court's judgment is not open to legal attack.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 13. Dezember 2011 - 3 Sa 1406/11 - wird zurückgewiesen.

2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.