Waiver of facts and reasoning under § 313a ZPO in labor law revision proceedings
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Labor Court (BAG) rejected the defendant's revision appeal, thereby upholding the lower court's judgment from November 12, 2010, and ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the revision proceedings. The dispute arose from a labor law conflict where the parties waived the detailed statement of facts and reasoning pursuant to § 313a ZPO, indicating a settlement or simplification of the procedural record. As the substantive grounds were omitted by agreement, the decisive legal basis rests on the procedural application of § 313a ZPO, which allows parties to forgo the recording of facts and reasons in favor of a direct operative judgment.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertWaiver of facts and reasoning under § 313a ZPO in labor law revision proceedings: The dispute arose from a labor law conflict where the parties waived the detailed statement of facts and reasoning pursuant to § 313a ZPO, indicating a settlement or simplification of the procedural record. As the substantive grounds were omitted by agreement, the decisive legal basis rests on the procedural application of § 313a ZPO, which allows parties to forgo the recording of facts and reasons in favor of a direct operative judgment.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 12. November 2010 - 9 Sa 1239/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.
2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO).
Müller-Glöge
Laux
Biebl
Zoller
Pollert