Admissibility of claims in labor law proceedings: Dismissal of revision due to procedural defect

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision, modifying the lower court's judgment to explicitly state that the claims are inadmissible and ordering the plaintiff to bear the litigation costs. The dispute involved a civil labor law proceeding where the plaintiff challenged a prior decision, but the court found the proceedings procedurally defective. The decisive legal basis was the doctrine of admissibility in civil procedure, rendering the substantive claims moot due to procedural deficiencies that necessitated a dismissal for lack of admissibility rather than a judgment on the merits.