Civil revision dismissed via § 552a ZPO for failure to rebut prior reasoning
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Civil Procedure (BGH) dismissed the plaintiff's appeal on revision and awarded the costs to the defendant, upholding the lower court's judgment from the Cologne Regional Court. The case involved a civil dispute where the plaintiff challenged the decision of the 26th Civil Chamber of the Cologne Regional Court, resulting in the plaintiff losing the litigation. The ruling was issued under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), specifically relying on § 552a Sentence 1 for the dismissal and § 97 Paragraph 1 for the cost allocation. The court referenced its prior reasoning in a notice of January 7, 2014, which the plaintiff failed to rebut within the stipulated deadline pursuant to § 552a Sentence 2 in conjunction with § 522 Paragraph 2 Sentence 3 ZPO.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 552a Satz 1 ZPO, § 522 Abs. 2 Satz 3 ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Civil revision dismissed via § 552a ZPO for failure to rebut prior reasoning: The case involved a civil dispute where the plaintiff challenged the decision of the 26th Civil Chamber of the Cologne Regional Court, resulting in the plaintiff losing the litigation. The ruling was issued under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), specifically relying on § 552a Sentence 1 for the dismissal and § 97 Paragraph 1 for the cost allocation. The court referenced its prior reasoning in a notice of January 7, 2014, which the plaintiff failed to rebut within the stipulated deadline pursuant to § 552a Sentence 2 in conjunction with § 522 Paragraph 2 Sentence 3 ZPO.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for the dismissal of the appeal on revision without a new reasoning, referring to a prior notice.
Basis for the allocation of court costs to the unsuccessful party.
Volltext
Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil der 26. Zivilkammer des Landgerichts Köln vom 29. Mai 2013 wird gemäß § 552a Satz 1 ZPO auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.
Streitwert: 3.420,23 €
[GRUENDE]
Zur Begründung verweist der Senat in vollem Umfang auf die Ausführungen in seinem Hinweisbeschluss vom 7. Januar 2014, zu dem die Klägerin innerhalb der eingeräumten Frist keine Stellung genommen hat (§ 552a Satz 2 i.V.m. § 522 Abs. 2 Satz 3 ZPO).
Die Kostenentscheidung beruht auf § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO.
Mayen Harsdorf-Gebhardt Dr. Karczewski
Lehmann Dr. Brockmöller