Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
1 StR 307/13 KI-generiert

Stalking offense: Dismissal of revision and confirmation of psychiatric confinement order under §§ 346, 349 StPO

Geschäftsnummer 1 StR 307/13
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The German Federal Court of Justice (1st Criminal Senate) dismissed the defendant's appeal as unfounded and ordered the defendant to bear the costs, thereby upholding the Lower Regional Court Munich I's judgment of December 18, 2012, which imposed a measure of securing the defendant in a psychiatric institution for long-term stalking; the court simultaneously reversed a procedural ruling that had previously deemed the appeal inadmissible. The dispute centered on the criminal proceedings regarding years of stalking conduct and the subsequent legal challenge to the final decision on the defendant's incapacitation. The decisive legal basis involved the application of the Code of Criminal Procedure provisions governing the review of appeals, specifically rejecting the grounds for revision as failing to demonstrate any legal error to the defendant's detriment, and correcting the procedural status of the appeal to allow for a substantive examination of the underlying criminal and psychiatric detention order.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 346 Abs. 2 StPO, § 349 Abs. 2 StPO; Stalking offense: Dismissal of revision and confirmation of psychiatric confinement order under §§ 346, 349 StPO: The dispute centered on the criminal proceedings regarding years of stalking conduct and the subsequent legal challenge to the final decision on the defendant's incapacitation. The decisive legal basis involved the application of the Code of Criminal Procedure provisions governing the review of appeals, specifically rejecting the grounds for revision as failing to demonstrate any legal error to the defendant's detriment, and correcting the procedural status of the appeal to allow for a substantive examination of the underlying criminal and psychiatric detention order.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Strafprozessordnung Haftprüfung psychiatrische Unterbringung prozessuale Revision Verbot des Mobbings Rechtsstellung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 346 Abs. 2 StPO
Cited as the procedural basis for reversing the lower court's decision that had erroneously declared the appeal inadmissible.
§ 349 Abs. 2 StPO
Cited as the legal ground for dismissing the appeal as unfounded due to the absence of any legal error to the defendant's detriment.
KI-generiert
4 StR 543/20
Stalking conviction and psychiatric confinement based on insufficient proof of persistence, significantly diminished culpability, and danger forecast
4 StR 17/25
Stalking and protection order violations: requirement for independent judicial review of the family law order's material legality and the "repeatedly" element under the amended Stalking Act.
4 StR 111/14
Scope of "significant importance" for psychiatric detention: sufficiency of prognosis for basic stalking offenses
6 StR 362/23
Criminal revision for dangerous bodily harm and stalking with coercion
3 StR 25/22
Ineligibility of Stalking as a Serious Offense for Mandatory Psychiatric Hospitalization Under Section 63 StGB

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 346 Abs. 2 StPO

Cited as the procedural basis for reversing the lower court's decision that had erroneously declared the appeal inadmissible.

§ 349 Abs. 2 StPO

Cited as the legal ground for dismissing the appeal as unfounded due to the absence of any legal error to the defendant's detriment.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Strafverfahren wegen jahrelanger Nachstellung: Unterbringung des Täters in einem psychiatrischen Krankenhaus

[TENOR]

1. Der Beschluss des Landgerichts München I vom 25. April 2013, mit dem die Revision des Angeklagten als unzulässig verworfen wurde, wird aus den zutreffenden Gründen der Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts vom 17. Juni 2013 aufgehoben (§ 346 Abs. 2 StPO).

2. Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts München I vom 18. Dezember 2012 wird als unbegründet verworfen, da die Nachprüfung des Urteils aufgrund der Revisionsrechtfertigung keinen Rechtsfehler zum Nachteil des Angeklagten ergeben hat (§ 349 Abs. 2 StPO).

3. Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten seiner Revision zu tragen.

Wahl Jäger Cirener

Radtke Mosbacher