Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5 StR 462/12 KI-generiert

Subsequent total sentence formation and non-prejudicial erroneous aggregation of non-joinable prior convictions

Geschäftsnummer 5 StR 462/12
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the defendant's appeal as unfounded, upholding the ruling of the Potsdam Regional Court. The case involved a challenge to the subsequent aggregation of multiple prior sentences into a single total sentence, specifically arguing that including several prior convictions that were not eligible for aggregation with one another improperly burdened the defendant. The Court held that the erroneous inclusion of such non-aggregable prior convictions does not constitute a procedural disadvantage (Beschwer) for the defendant, thereby validating the total sentence structure under the relevant provisions of criminal procedure and sentencing law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 349 Abs. 2 StPO; Subsequent total sentence formation and non-prejudicial erroneous aggregation of non-joinable prior convictions: The case involved a challenge to the subsequent aggregation of multiple prior sentences into a single total sentence, specifically arguing that including several prior convictions that were not eligible for aggregation with one another improperly burdened the defendant. The Court held that the erroneous inclusion of such non-aggregable prior convictions does not constitute a procedural disadvantage (Beschwer) for the defendant, thereby validating the total sentence structure under the relevant provisions of criminal procedure and sentencing law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Strafurteil Bildung einer Gesamtstrafe E-Justice Corpus Juris Strafvollstreckungsverjährung Zwischenentscheidcharakter

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 349 Abs. 2 StPO
Main procedural ground cited in the dispositive for dismissing the appeal as unfounded.
KI-generiert
1 StR 139/23
Subsequent total sentence formation: requirement to include prior conviction where final after commission of current offenses
1 StR 615/19
Subsequent total sentence formation: error in attributing finality (Zäsurwirkung) to an intermediate conviction when offenses predate it, requiring aggregation with the earliest eligible prior sentence
3 StR 113/24
Total sentence formation: erroneous extension of the Zäsurwirkung of a prior judgment to offenses committed before that judgment
1 StR 189/25
Total sentence formation after caesura effect of prior judgment and application of non-aggravation principle on remand
1 StR 180/23
Total Sentence Formation and Zäsurwirkung: Determining the Cut-Off Date for Aggregation of Prior Judgments After Objection to a Court Order

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 349 Abs. 2 StPO

Main procedural ground cited in the dispositive for dismissing the appeal as unfounded.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Nachträgliche Bildung der Gesamtstrafe: Beschwer des Angeklagten durch Einbeziehung mehrerer, untereinander nicht gesamtstraffähiger Vorverurteilungen

[TENOR]

Die Revision des Angeklagten F. gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Potsdam vom 12. März 2012 wird gemäß § 349 Abs. 2 StPO als unbegründet verworfen.

Der Angeklagte hat die Kosten seines Rechtsmittels zu tragen.

Die fehlerhafte Einbeziehung von Strafen aus mehreren, untereinander nicht gesamtstraffähigen Vorverurteilungen beschwert den Angeklagten nicht.

Basdorf Raum Dölp

König Bellay