Admissibility of hearing objection to challenge substantive correctness of non-admission decision

The Federal Administrative Court dismissed the appellants' hearing objection (Anhörungsrüge) against a prior order, leaving the original non-admission decision in force and imposing the procedural costs on the appellants. The dispute concerned a failed application for leave to appeal against a non-admission complaint in a previous administrative proceeding, where the appellants argued that the court had failed to consider their submissions. The court held that a hearing objection is not a vehicle to challenge the substantive correctness of the underlying decision and found no evidence that the court had ignored the appellants' arguments, dismissing the motion under the general requirements for hearing objections. The decision was based on § 154(2) and § 159 sentence 2 of the Administrative Court Code (VwGO) for the costs, with the court fee determined by Item 5400 of the Court Fees Act.