VB.2023.00273 · Negative Jurisdictional Conflict Regarding Cost Waiver Appeal (Verwaltungsgericht)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party sought a cost waiver concerning a prior administrative court decision, but the administrative court, while acknowledging that the matter—an appeal against a decision on cost remission from child and adult protection proceedings—should be reviewed by the Higher Court, found that the Higher Court deemed itself incompetent, creating a negative jurisdictional conflict that the administrative court could not resolve by substituting itself as the appellate body. Consequently, the court dismissed the request for cost remission based on the reasoning in a prior judgment concerning the lack of grounds to challenge the initial administrative assessment, rejected the application for free legal aid due to the evident lack of prospect of success, but took the negative jurisdictional conflict into account when setting the court fee, and refused to forward the matter to the Higher Court.

Legislator-Regeste

Amtlich

Kostenerlass | Kostenerlass. (vgl. das Urteil VB.2020.00694 des Verwaltungsgerichts vom 8. August 2022). Der Beschwerdeführer bringt in der Beschwerde nichts vor, was die zutreffenden, dem Urteil VB.2020.00694 des Verwaltungsgerichts vom 8. August 2022 folgenden Erwägungen des Regierungsrats infrage stellen würde. Rechtsmittel gegen einen Entscheid eines Bezirksrats über den Erlass von rechtskräftig auferlegten Kosten aus einem Beschwerdeverfahren aus dem Bereich des Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrechts sind vom Obergericht des Kantons Zürich zu beurteilen. Indes erachtet sich dieses seinerseits für unzuständig, was zu einem negativen Kompetenzkonflikt führt, den (auch) das Verwaltungsgericht nicht selber auflösen kann. Dadurch wird zwar die Rechtsweggarantie des Beschwerdeführers verletzt. Gründe, von der im Urteil VB.2020.00694 vom 8. August 2022 vertretenen Auffassung abzuweichen, bestehen seitens des Verwaltungsgerichts jedoch nicht. Namentlich ist es nicht Sache des Verwaltungsgerichts, trotz Unzuständigkeit ein Rechtsmittel anstelle des zuständigen Obergerichts zu behandeln, um dadurch eine von Letzterem zu vertretende Verletzung der Rechtsweggarantie zu heilen (E. 3.1). Abweisung des Gesuchs um unentgeltliche Prozessführung für das Beschwerdeverfahren aufgrund offensichtlicher Aussichtslosigkeit, jedoch Berücksichtiung des negativen Kompetenzkonflikts bei der Bemessung der Gerichtsgebühr (E. 3.2). Keine Weiterleitung an das Obergericht (E. 5). Abweisung.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

negativer Kompetenzkonflikt Anfechtung von Verwaltungsverfügungen Verwaltungsgebühr Kostenfestsetzung unentgeltliche Rechtspflege Kostenerlass

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert

Art. 29a BV

Although the denial of the request for free legal aid is based on obvious hopelessness (E. 3.2), the court considers the negative conflict of jurisdiction when assessing the court fee, which relates to fundamental rights.

Art. 80 GOG

This provision likely governs the jurisdiction regarding the appeal, which the court ultimately did not exercise due to the negative conflict of jurisdiction.

Art. 81 GOG

This provision likely governs the jurisdiction regarding the appeal, which the court ultimately did not exercise due to the negative conflict of jurisdiction.

Art. 83 Abs. III GOG

This provision is cited in the section listing applicable legal norms, suggesting its relevance to the court's decision regarding jurisdiction or the substance of the cost waiver.

Art. 84 GOG

This provision is cited in the section listing applicable legal norms, suggesting its relevance to the court's decision regarding jurisdiction or the substance of the cost waiver.

Art. 74 Abs. II KV

This provision is cited in the section listing applicable legal norms, suggesting its relevance to the court's decision regarding jurisdiction or the substance of the cost waiver.

Art. 450 ZGB

This provision is cited in the section listing applicable legal norms, suggesting its relevance to the court's decision regarding jurisdiction or the substance of the cost waiver.

Art. 450f ZGB

This provision is cited in the section listing applicable legal norms, suggesting its relevance to the court's decision regarding jurisdiction or the substance of the cost waiver.

KI-generiert

PQ200009

Appeal against Cost Waiver Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction

PQ120007

Appeal Dismissed: Cost Waiver Request Improperly Addressed to Court Over Fee Obligation

RU210117

Jurisdictional Error in Conciliation Cost Appeal

SB.2018.00019

Appeal of Court Clerk's Cost Waiver Denial

KE.2011.00001

Waiver of Court Costs Following Dismissal of Appeal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert

Art. 29a BV

Although the denial of the request for free legal aid is based on obvious hopelessness (E. 3.2), the court considers the negative conflict of jurisdiction when assessing the court fee, which relates to fundamental rights.

Art. 80 GOG

This provision likely governs the jurisdiction regarding the appeal, which the court ultimately did not exercise due to the negative conflict of jurisdiction.

Art. 81 GOG

This provision likely governs the jurisdiction regarding the appeal, which the court ultimately did not exercise due to the negative conflict of jurisdiction.

Art. 83 Abs. III GOG