VB.2021.00126 · Appealability of Police Decision Without Exhausting Internal Remedy (Verwaltungsgericht)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court addressed a situation where a higher administrative authority declined functional jurisdiction over an appeal against a decision issued by the city police, which the appellant sought to challenge directly with the higher authority instead of pursuing an internal review. The court reasoned that, assuming the police letter was indeed an appealable administrative act, the appellant was first required to exhaust the internal remedy of a request for re-evaluation with the city before appealing further; furthermore, the court affirmed its own jurisdiction over the appeal against the jurisdictional decision, ultimately dismissing the appeal because the prescribed internal appeal procedure had not been followed, and further noted that publishing the judgment online did not infringe on any private interests.

Legislator-Regeste

Amtlich

Polizeidaten | Funktionelle Zuständigkeit Das Statthalteramt verneinte seine funktionelle Zuständigkeit zur Behandlung eines Rekurses gegen ein Schreiben der Stadtpolizei. Gegen diesen Zwischenentscheid steht die Beschwerde offen (E. 1.2). Soweit das Schreiben ein zulässiges Anfechtungsobjekt darstellen sollte, wäre dagegen zunächst ein stadtinternes Rechtsmittel (Neubeurteilungsgesuch) zu ergreifen (E. 2). Der Publikation des Urteils auf dem Internet stehen keine privaten Interessen entgegen (E. 5). Abweisung.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

Verneinung der Zuständigkeit Verwaltungsbehörde Rahmenbeschluss anfechtbarer Zwischenentscheid Subrogation des Gemeinwesens polizeiliche Generalklausel

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert

Art. 92 Abs. I BGG

This provision is cited in the context of the overall legal framework but is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders regarding the verdict.

Art. 92 Abs. II BGG

This provision is cited in the context of the overall legal framework but is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders regarding the verdict.

Art. 66 Abs. I GemeindeO

III VRG Art. 66 Abs. I GemeindeO Zürich · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4

Art. 66 Abs. I GemeindeO Zürich

This provision is cited in the context of the overall legal framework but is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders regarding costs or legal aid.

Art./§ 170 GG

This provision is cited in the context of the overall legal framework but is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders regarding the verdict.

Art./§ 170 Abs. I lit. c GG

This provision is cited in the context of the overall legal framework but is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders regarding the verdict.

§ 5 Abs. I VRG

This provision is cited in the context of the overall legal framework but is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders regarding the verdict.

§ 19a Abs. II VRG

This provision is cited in the context of the overall legal framework but is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders regarding the verdict.

KI-generiert

VB.2009.00553

Police Authority's Lack of Standing to Appeal Judicial Order

UE240155

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Police Action; Prior Non-Prosecution Decision Upheld

VB.2022.00171

Appeal Regarding Review of Short-Term Police Exclusion Order and Legal Interest

VB.2024.00664

Dismissal of Appeal Against Interim Ruling on Police Custody Suspension

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. I GemeindeO Zürich

This provision is cited in the context of the overall legal framework but is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders regarding costs or legal aid.

Art. 92 Abs. I BGG