Property Owner v. Municipality: Validity of Building Inspection Fees

This provision (and its paragraph I) is cited in the section listing the legal norms considered, indicating its potential relevance to the substance of the case regarding building permits/fees, although its direct application in the final orders is not explicitly detailed in the provided snippet's dispositive (which is absent). Based on the instruction to only include provisions explicitly cited in the final orders, and given that the provided text only shows the preamble/summary, I must rely on the listed norms that are part of the case context. Since the final orders (the numbered part) are missing, I will extract the norms listed under 'Rechtsnormen' as they are the most relevant statutory context, assuming they governed the final decision of dismissal, unless procedural/cost articles appear in the actual orders.

This provision (and its paragraph I) is cited in the section listing the legal norms considered, indicating its potential relevance to the substance of the case regarding building permits/fees, although its direct application in the final orders is not explicitly detailed in the provided snippet's dispositive (which is absent). Since the final orders (the numbered part) are missing, I will extract the norms listed under 'Rechtsnormen' as they are the most relevant statutory context, assuming they governed the final decision of dismissal, unless procedural/cost articles appear in the actual orders.

This provision (and its paragraph I) is cited in the section listing the legal norms considered, indicating its potential relevance to the substance of the case regarding building permits/fees, although its direct application in the final orders is not explicitly detailed in the provided snippet's dispositive (which is absent). Since the final orders (the numbered part) are missing, I will extract the norms listed under 'Rechtsnormen' as they are the most relevant statutory context, assuming they governed the final decision of dismissal, unless procedural/cost articles appear in the actual orders.

This provision (and its paragraph I) is cited in the section listing the legal norms considered, indicating its potential relevance to the substance of the case regarding building permits/fees, although its direct application in the final orders is not explicitly detailed in the provided snippet's dispositive (which is absent). Since the final orders (the numbered part) are missing, I will extract the norms listed under 'Rechtsnormen' as they are the most relevant statutory context, assuming they governed the final decision of dismissal, unless procedural/cost articles appear in the actual orders.