Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VB.2019.00423 • VG ZH VB.2019.00423 KI-generiert

Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing of Annual Premium Invoice Dispute

Geschäftsnummer VB.2019.00423
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Zürich (CH-ZH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party appealed a lower court's decision to not accept their appeal concerning an annual premium invoice, asserting the lower court erred by dismissing the appeal as untimely because the filing missed the deadline by three days and lacked valid grounds for reinstatement. The administrative court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the three-day delay without valid grounds for reinstatement justified the non-acceptance of the appeal, and further determined that the lower court's imposition of high but not excessive procedural costs would not be overturned.

Legislator-Regeste

Amtlich

Jahresprämienrechnung | [Beschwerde gegen einen Nichteintretensentscheid des Baurekursgerichts] Das Baurekursgericht ist zu Recht nicht auf den Rekurs des Beschwerdeführers eingetreten, da dieser die Rekursfrist um drei Tage verpasste und keine Fristwiederherstellungsgründe vorlagen (E. 2). Die vom Baurekursgericht festgesetzten Verfahrenskosten von Fr. 860.- für das Rekursverfahren liegen am obersten Rand des noch Vertretbaren und dürfen deshalb vom Verwaltungsgericht nicht korrigiert werden (E. 3). Abweisung.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
verspätete Einreichung Fristversäumnis nicht-administrative Streitigkeit Verfahrensverzögerungen materielle Überprüfung stichhaltige Gründe

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 11 Abs. II VRG
This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.
§ 12 Abs. I VRG
This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.
§ 12 Abs. II VRG
This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.
§ 22 Abs. I VRG
This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.
§ 22 Abs. II VRG
This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.
§ 338 PBG
This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.
§ 2 GebV VGr
This provision relates to the calculation and assessment of court fees, which was discussed in the reasoning concerning the costs.
§ 3 Abs. III GebV VGr
This provision relates to the calculation and assessment of court fees, which was discussed in the reasoning concerning the costs.
KI-generiert
RT200055
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
RT230023
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
UV.2018.00280
Appeal Dismissed: Late Objection to Insurance Premium Invoice
RT220108
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
RT130087
Insurance Premium Enforcement Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 11 Abs. II VRG

This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.

§ 12 Abs. I VRG

This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.

§ 12 Abs. II VRG

This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.

§ 22 Abs. I VRG

This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.

§ 22 Abs. II VRG

This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.

§ 338 PBG

This provision was cited in relation to the procedural context, specifically concerning the missed deadline for the appeal (Rekurs), which is the basis for the non-entry into the merits decision being reviewed.

§ 2 GebV VGr

This provision relates to the calculation and assessment of court fees, which was discussed in the reasoning concerning the costs.

§ 3 Abs. III GebV VGr

This provision relates to the calculation and assessment of court fees, which was discussed in the reasoning concerning the costs.

§ 4 Abs. II GebV VGr

This provision relates to the calculation and assessment of court fees, which was discussed in the reasoning concerning the costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2019.00423

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=219677&W10_KEY=13317054&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2019.00423 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 31.10.2019 · Spruchkörper: · 4. Abteilung/4. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Das Bundesgericht ist auf eine Beschwerde in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenheiten gegen diesen Entscheid am 04.12.2019 nicht eingetreten. · Rechtsgebiet: · Übriges Verwaltungsrecht · Betreff: · Jahresprämienrechnung · [Beschwerde gegen einen Nichteintretensentscheid des Baurekursgerichts] Das Baurekursgericht ist zu Recht nicht auf den Rekurs des Beschwerdeführers eingetreten, da dieser die Rekursfrist um drei Tage verpasste und keine Fristwiederherstellungsgründe vorlagen (E. 2).

Die vom Baurekursgericht festgesetzten Verfahrenskosten von Fr. 860.- für das Rekursverfahren liegen am obersten Rand des noch Vertretbaren und dürfen deshalb vom Verwaltungsgericht nicht korrigiert werden (E. 3). Abweisung. · --- · Stichworte: · FRISTBEGINN GEBÜHRENBEMESSUNG GERICHTSGEBÜHR GESETZLICHE FRIST REKURSFRIST WIEDERHERSTELLUNG DER REKURSFRIST WIEDERHERSTELLUNGSGRÜNDE · Rechtsnormen: · § 2 GebV VGr § 3 Abs. III GebV VGr § 4 Abs. II GebV VGr § 338 PBG § 11 Abs. II VRG § 12 Abs. I VRG § 12 Abs. II VRG § 22 Abs. I VRG § 22 Abs. II VRG · Publikationen:

· - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4