Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
VB.2019.00254 • VG ZH VB.2019.00254 KI-generiert

Revocation of Permanent Residency Upheld Due to Criminal Offenses and Limited Integration

Geschäftsnummer VB.2019.00254
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Zürich (CH-ZH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court upheld the revocation of a permanent residency permit for an individual with a lengthy stay but limited integration, who had a history of drug-related offenses culminating in a 30-month prison sentence. The court reasoned that the revocation was justified under immigration law, considering the severity and repetition of the offenses, the lack of strong integration, and the need for general prevention, outweighing the individual's interest in remaining in the country.

Legislator-Regeste

Amtlich

Niederlassungsbewilligung (Widerruf) | Bewilligungswiderruf nach Verurteilung zu längerfristiger Freiheitsstrafe. Die Niederlassungsbewilligung der trotz langjährigen Aufenthalts nicht sonderlich gut integrierten Beschwerdeführerin wurde zu Recht widerrufen, nachdem diese wiederholt einschlägig delinquiert und zuletzt wegen Drogendelikten zu einer Freiheitsstrafe von dreissig Monaten verurteilt wurde (E. 2 und 3). Abweisung der Beschwerde.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Bewilligungsentzug Verhältnismässigkeitsprinzip allgemeiner Rechtsgrundsatz Verbleiberecht Strafurteil fester Wohnsitz

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 62 Abs. I lit. b AIG
This provision likely serves as the legal basis for the revocation of the residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case (revocation of residence permit due to criminal conviction).
Art. 63 Abs. I lit. a AIG
This provision is likely related to the conditions or grounds for revoking a residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.
Art. 63 Abs. II AIG
This provision might specify further conditions or consequences related to the revocation of a residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.
Art. 63 Abs. III AIG
This provision could relate to procedural aspects or specific circumstances regarding the revocation of a residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.
Art. 83 AIG
This provision likely pertains to transitional law or specific regulations within the Aliens Act, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its relevance to the case.
Art. 96 AIG
Art. 96 Abs. II AIG
This provision likely relates to the legal consequences or procedures following a criminal conviction concerning aliens, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.
Art. 13 Abs. I BV
This provision likely relates to fundamental rights, possibly the right to privacy or family life, which might have been considered in the context of the revocation, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 62 Abs. I lit. b AIG

This provision likely serves as the legal basis for the revocation of the residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case (revocation of residence permit due to criminal conviction).

Art. 63 Abs. I lit. a AIG

This provision is likely related to the conditions or grounds for revoking a residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.

Art. 63 Abs. II AIG

This provision might specify further conditions or consequences related to the revocation of a residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.

Art. 63 Abs. III AIG

This provision could relate to procedural aspects or specific circumstances regarding the revocation of a residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.

Art. 83 AIG

This provision likely pertains to transitional law or specific regulations within the Aliens Act, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its relevance to the case.

Art. 96 Abs. II AIG

This provision likely relates to the legal consequences or procedures following a criminal conviction concerning aliens, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.

Art. 13 Abs. I BV

This provision likely relates to fundamental rights, possibly the right to privacy or family life, which might have been considered in the context of the revocation, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.

Art. 36 BV

This provision likely relates to the proportionality of legal measures, a principle often considered in administrative law cases involving restrictions of rights, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.

Art. 121 Abs. III BV

This provision likely relates to provisions concerning the expulsion or deportation of foreign nationals, a relevant aspect in cases of serious criminal offenses, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.

Art. 8 Abs. I EMRK

This provision, concerning the right to respect for private and family life, is likely relevant to the proportionality assessment of the revocation decision, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.

Art. 8 Abs. II EMRK

This provision, which outlines grounds for interference with the right to privacy and family life, is likely relevant to justifying the revocation of the residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.

Art. 66a StGB

This provision likely relates to the legal consequences of specific criminal offenses, such as drug offenses, which are central to the case, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.

§ 25 VRG

This provision likely relates to procedural rules within the Administrative Procedure Act of the Canton of Zurich, possibly concerning the appeal process or the decision-making process, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.

§ 55 VRG

This provision likely relates to the allocation of costs in administrative proceedings within the Canton of Zurich, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its potential relevance to the final orders.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2019.00254

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=219286&W10_KEY=13317061&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2019.00254 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 29.05.2019 · Spruchkörper: · 2. Abteilung/2. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Ausländerrecht · Betreff: · Niederlassungsbewilligung (Widerruf) · Bewilligungswiderruf nach Verurteilung zu längerfristiger Freiheitsstrafe. Die Niederlassungsbewilligung der trotz langjährigen Aufenthalts nicht sonderlich gut integrierten Beschwerdeführerin wurde zu Recht widerrufen, nachdem diese wiederholt einschlägig delinquiert und zuletzt wegen Drogendelikten zu einer Freiheitsstrafe von dreissig Monaten verurteilt wurde (E. 2 und 3).

Abweisung der Beschwerde. · --- · Stichworte: · AUSSCHAFFUNGSINITIATIVE BETÄUBUNGSMITTELDELIKT DROGENDELIKT DROGENDELINQUENZ DROGENSUCHT GENERALPRÄVENTION LÄNGERFRISTIGE FREIHEITSSTRAFE RENEJA-PRAXIS SUCHTERKRANKUNG THAILAND ÜBERGANGSRECHT VERWARNUNG WIDERRUF DER NIEDERLASSUNGSBEWILLIGUNG WOHLVERHALTEN · Rechtsnormen: · Art. 62 Abs. I lit. b AIG Art. 63 Abs. I lit. a AIG Art. 63 Abs. II AIG Art. 63 Abs. III AIG Art. 83 AIG Art. 96 AIG Art. 96 Abs. II AIG Art. 13 Abs. I BV Art. 36 BV Art. 121 Abs. III BV Art. 8 Abs. I EMRK Art. 8 Abs. II EMRK Art. 66a StGB § 25 VRG § 55 VRG · Publikationen:

· - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3