Revocation of Permanent Residency Upheld Due to Criminal Offenses and Limited Integration
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe court upheld the revocation of a permanent residency permit for an individual with a lengthy stay but limited integration, who had a history of drug-related offenses culminating in a 30-month prison sentence. The court reasoned that the revocation was justified under immigration law, considering the severity and repetition of the offenses, the lack of strong integration, and the need for general prevention, outweighing the individual's interest in remaining in the country.
Legislator-Regeste
AmtlichNiederlassungsbewilligung (Widerruf) | Bewilligungswiderruf nach Verurteilung zu längerfristiger Freiheitsstrafe. Die Niederlassungsbewilligung der trotz langjährigen Aufenthalts nicht sonderlich gut integrierten Beschwerdeführerin wurde zu Recht widerrufen, nachdem diese wiederholt einschlägig delinquiert und zuletzt wegen Drogendelikten zu einer Freiheitsstrafe von dreissig Monaten verurteilt wurde (E. 2 und 3). Abweisung der Beschwerde.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThis provision likely serves as the legal basis for the revocation of the residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case (revocation of residence permit due to criminal conviction).
This provision is likely related to the conditions or grounds for revoking a residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.
This provision might specify further conditions or consequences related to the revocation of a residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.
This provision could relate to procedural aspects or specific circumstances regarding the revocation of a residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.
This provision likely pertains to transitional law or specific regulations within the Aliens Act, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its relevance to the case.
This provision likely relates to the legal consequences or procedures following a criminal conviction concerning aliens, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its connection to the subject matter of the case.
This provision likely relates to fundamental rights, possibly the right to privacy or family life, which might have been considered in the context of the revocation, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.
This provision likely relates to the proportionality of legal measures, a principle often considered in administrative law cases involving restrictions of rights, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.
This provision likely relates to provisions concerning the expulsion or deportation of foreign nationals, a relevant aspect in cases of serious criminal offenses, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.
This provision, concerning the right to respect for private and family life, is likely relevant to the proportionality assessment of the revocation decision, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.
This provision, which outlines grounds for interference with the right to privacy and family life, is likely relevant to justifying the revocation of the residence permit, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.
This provision likely relates to the legal consequences of specific criminal offenses, such as drug offenses, which are central to the case, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.
This provision likely relates to procedural rules within the Administrative Procedure Act of the Canton of Zurich, possibly concerning the appeal process or the decision-making process, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section.
This provision likely relates to the allocation of costs in administrative proceedings within the Canton of Zurich, as indicated by its inclusion in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and its potential relevance to the final orders.
Volltext
Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2019.00254
--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)
[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=219286&W10_KEY=13317061&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)
--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2019.00254 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 29.05.2019 · Spruchkörper: · 2. Abteilung/2. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Ausländerrecht · Betreff: · Niederlassungsbewilligung (Widerruf) · Bewilligungswiderruf nach Verurteilung zu längerfristiger Freiheitsstrafe. Die Niederlassungsbewilligung der trotz langjährigen Aufenthalts nicht sonderlich gut integrierten Beschwerdeführerin wurde zu Recht widerrufen, nachdem diese wiederholt einschlägig delinquiert und zuletzt wegen Drogendelikten zu einer Freiheitsstrafe von dreissig Monaten verurteilt wurde (E. 2 und 3).
Abweisung der Beschwerde. · --- · Stichworte: · AUSSCHAFFUNGSINITIATIVE BETÄUBUNGSMITTELDELIKT DROGENDELIKT DROGENDELINQUENZ DROGENSUCHT GENERALPRÄVENTION LÄNGERFRISTIGE FREIHEITSSTRAFE RENEJA-PRAXIS SUCHTERKRANKUNG THAILAND ÜBERGANGSRECHT VERWARNUNG WIDERRUF DER NIEDERLASSUNGSBEWILLIGUNG WOHLVERHALTEN · Rechtsnormen: · Art. 62 Abs. I lit. b AIG Art. 63 Abs. I lit. a AIG Art. 63 Abs. II AIG Art. 63 Abs. III AIG Art. 83 AIG Art. 96 AIG Art. 96 Abs. II AIG Art. 13 Abs. I BV Art. 36 BV Art. 121 Abs. III BV Art. 8 Abs. I EMRK Art. 8 Abs. II EMRK Art. 66a StGB § 25 VRG § 55 VRG · Publikationen:
· - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3